“Tron” has stood out as a franchise that explores the digital universe and how technology impacts humanity. The first two films focused on characters entering the computer world and dealing with their consequences. “Tron: Ares” flips that idea, asking a new question: What if digital beings came into our world?
When “Tron: Ares” was announced, anticipation was high. After two popular films and several video games, many fans felt the franchise was ready for strong continuation. Early previews added to the excitement, showcasing sleek CGI and teasing a powerful soundtrack. However, when the film finally reached theaters, reactions were mixed. Some viewers praised the visuals, music, and core concept, while others criticized its pacing and storytelling choices.
The central idea behind “Tron: Ares” is compelling. Instead of humans traveling into a digital realm, the film explores what would happen if digital life crossed into the physical world. While the movie answers this question, it does so in a rushed way. Early in the film, viewers are introduced to Ares, who is created and placed in control of the Dillinger Systems database. His development feels compressed, as he is created, trained for combat, and sent into the real world within minutes. Soon after, the film hints at his desire for permanence in the physical world, but this motivation is not explored in much depth.
Another major criticism is the treatment of returning characters. Quorra and Sam, who had significant potential at the end of “Tron: Legacy”, are briefly mentioned at the beginning of the film and then disappear entirely from the story. For many fans, this made “Tron: Ares” feel less like a true sequel and more like a disconnected reboot.
To get a broader perspective, several viewers were asked to rate the film on a scale of one to ten.
“I give it a three. I liked the soundtrack and the costumes, but I personally don’t like Jared Leto, and the storyline was long and boring.”
“I give it a seven. Amazing soundtrack and it opened a lot of possible story arcs. I didn’t like how they rushed the romance. Either they should have not done it at all or developed it more.”
“I give it a five. In my opinion, the film should have been marketed as ‘From the World of Tron.’ That would have made it feel more like a side story instead of the main sequel.”
Overall, “Tron: Ares” remains a mixed experience. The film excels in technical areas, particularly its detailed CGI without the use of AI. Practical production choices, and a standout soundtrack by Nine Inch Nails adds energy and atmosphere. At the same time, rushed character development, the dismissal of established characters, and underdeveloped story elements hold it back.
While many viewers will still find aspects to enjoy, reactions largely depend on how closely they examine the film’s flaws.
‘Tron: Ares’ is a reboot, not a sequel
Kellan Tripp, Staff Writer
January 21, 2026
From left, Greta Lee, Jared Leto and Arturo Castro in “Tron: Ares.” (Leah Gallo/Disney Enterprises, Inc./TNS)
Story continues below advertisement
























