Hunger Games sequel sticks to script with plenty of action

Tom Richardson, Staff writer

Imagine the worst thing that has ever happened to you. Then try to imagine reliving that exact moment over again. Not easy, right? Unfortunately, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark had to relive the worst experience of their lives for a second time, in the latest sequel to “The Hunger Games,” entitled “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire.”

In “Catching Fire,” Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) are on their Victory Tour after becoming the winners of the 74th Annual Hunger Games. But things are not getting better for Katniss—in fact, things have gotten worse. All the districts of Panem are suffering due to the Capitol’s fear of rebellion after watching what Katniss and Peeta did in the Hunger Games Tournament. The 75th annual Hunger Games represents the third Quarter Quell, in which a special twist is added to the games for that year, and while Katniss and Peeta thought they would become mentors for future Hunger Games Tournaments, the Capitol has other plans in mind.

What should impress viewers is the sequel’s brilliant first half, and how everything gets set-up. The aftermath of the first “Hunger Games” film is brilliantly incorporated, and it really shows just how brutal the Capitol gets within this cinematic universe. And new characters, such as Beetee and Finnick, add more pizazz to the film, as the two actors brought something new to the table that will feel fresh for many. Jennifer Lawrence’s return to the role of Katniss Everdeen was acted amazingly once again. “Catching Fire” also soars when it comes to effective drama and touching moments that will almost bring tears to viewers’ eyes for certain scenes.

Katniss Everdeen might be “the girl on fire,” but there are a few flaws along the way that might put the fire out for some. The film might feel a bit “spotty” for some viewers during the second half, specifically during the 75th Annual Hunger Games. As certain aspects of the book are adapted perfectly to the screen, other aspects either get skipped entirely or are only briefly mentioned. Also, certain challenges that the tributes face in the Hunger Games Arena this time around feel a tad boring. A good example of this would be Part 1’s forest in flames, getting replaced by Part 2’s poisonous fog. The film also runs into the same problem that most film trilogies face: it sets up too much for Part 3. Some might feel cheated by Part 2’s cliffhanger ending.

But for those who loved the first installment of “The Hunger Games,” this new installment should feel just as action-packed, just as entertaining, and acted just as well. This film could be a fun time at the movies, but at the same time don’t expect anything ground-breaking.